Can I Save You 225 Minutes?

February 18, 2010 by  

What do you think would happen if you added 225min of “target heart rate zone” cardio to your week? If you did 45min of jogging on 5 days per week, do you think that you’d lose some fat? Do you think your results would come in faster?

Nope.

Georgetown personal fitness trainer

Why didn't anyone tell me this was a waste of time?

It turns out that what will actually happen is NOTHING. You’d get the same results if you had watched American Idol, Desperate Housewives, and a couple of DVD’s.

I’ve reported on research like this before, but here is some more.

Researchers took obese women and divided them into 4 groups:

  1. Exercise group (EX) – they did 45min of aerobics on 5 days per week.
  2. Diet group (D) – they ate a reduced calorie diet (which only works because you end up eating fewer carbs FYI)
  3. Diet + Exercise Group (EX + D) – the did the 5 days @ 45min per session of aerobics + ate the same diet as the D group
  4. Control (C) – they didn’t do nothin’

At the end of 12 weeks there was “no significant change for EX relative to C.” In other words doing aerobic exercise is as effective as sitting on your ass… that is to say that it does nothing.

At the end of 12 weeks there was no significant difference between D and D + EX.  To quote the researchers: “Aerobic exercise training during a 12-week period has no discernible effects on body composition.”

Here’s the link to the free abstract, the full text costs however (I don’t get the money).

Well, That Study Wasn’t Long Enough!

Some people are thinking that the people in the above study just didn’t workout long enough.  The thought is, “what if we took the exercise that did not work before and make them do more of it and for more weeks, then it will work.”

Researchers in Seattle thought of this.  They took overweight people and had them do 60 minutes (fifteen more minutes baby!) of aerobic exercise for a whole dang year!

After 12 months of exercising for 6 hours per week here are the results:

  • Men lost 3.96lbs on average
  • Women lost 3.08lbs on average

With a big salad I can lose that much going to the bathroom.  (Some times I weight myself before and after just for fun.)

What’s funny is that the researchers said, “these data support the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Institute of Medicine guidelines of 60 min/d of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.”

REALLY!?!?!?!?  By the researchers numbers I’d need to 30 hours of aerobics per week if I wanted to drop 20 pounds this year.

Resistance training & interval training, however, DO work.  You can read more about that here and here.

Josef Brandenburg is 2010, Washington, DC  Personal Trainer of the Year Nominee for both Personal Fitness Professional Magazine and The Washington, DC Fitness Association, The DC Fitness Advisor and the Fitness Expert for the PCOS Challenge TV Show. He shows normal people with hectic lives and average genetics how to create the bodies they want in the time they actually have. To find out more about the 7-Day Free Trial click here. You can also pick up a FREE copy of his brand new CD – “Why Eat Less and Exercise More is The Worst Advice Ever” here.

Share

Comments

7 Responses to “Can I Save You 225 Minutes?”
  1. admin says:

    Here’s an email I got:

    Did they test for changes in things that actually matter, like lower blood pressure, higher energy level, increased endurance, reduced stress, improved mental health and all of the other benefits of exercise? People exercise for a lot of reasons. It’s not all about pounds and inches. Sometimes a run is just a way to get outside or blow off some steam.

  2. admin says:

    People do indeed workout for reasons other than looking better. Better health & fitness are very important. Aerobics lose the race here too however.

    You can get more fit – aerobically, anaerobically in LESS time with anaerobic exercise than you can with aerobics. In fact, 4min of interval training will trump 60min of endurance work for improved cardiovascular fitness.

    Interval training and resistance training are also far safer for everyone’s joints, but especially if you are overweight. Running 1 mile is 1,500 consecutive plyometric impacts with 4-5x body weight on a single leg without a single break… and it won’t do a damn thing about being overweight in the first place. Plus lots of endurance work has a negative impact on your hormone levels.

  3. I’d also like to add that I have 3 studies showing that long duration endurance work – like marathon running specifically, is probably actually bad for your heart/blood vessels.

Trackbacks

Check out what others are saying about this post...
  1. [...] Over the long weekend you might have gone out to the country, swam in your local lake, or just relaxed on your patio deck with your grill. Grilling is an easy way to cook up food that is good for you and your bathing suit body.  (Oh, just in case you still aren’t convinced interval training is the fastest way to looking great in your summer wardrobe check out Josef’s article, “Can I Save You 225 Minutes?” [...]

  2. facebook says:

    facebook…

    I like this specific post,I guess that that they having fun to learn this publish,they should take a very good site to create a information,many thanks for sharing this to me….

  3. [...] biggest difference between the people who get the bodies they want long term (other than not doing stupid stuff), is not that the winners have an easier life, or had more help; the difference is:  the winners [...]

  4. [...] equipment and great flooring that’s terrific for sleds, skipping, and jumping. Check out our DC workout and metabolic class in the picture [...]



Post a Comment

Security Code:

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

Switch to our mobile site