The Scales Can Lie – How You Can Be Normal Weight, Yet Obese
January 28, 2010 by admin
Filed under Uncategorized
After 40 years, medical research has finally caught up with the fitness industry (well, the few competent folks in the fitness industry) when it comes to scale weight. The “shocking” new news made it a big splash in The Wall Street Journal is that “you can be normal weight and fat at the same time.” The “amazing” discovery is that, low and behold, scale weight is not the be all and end all after all.
However the people that did this study caution that “the findings [that body fat % is as important or more important than scale weight] need to be validated with additional research.”
Well, while they take 10 years and $100 million to do additional research here’s how you can apply this NOW for FREE.
#1. Ignore traditional advice
It takes a lot of time to do and it sucks when it comes to results. Case in point – the Women’s Health Initiative 2006: The experimental group reduced their saturated fat and cholesterol intake and cut their overall caloric intake by an average of 360 calories per day for 8 whole years.
Let’s do the math on that to see how many pounds that they should have lost if the whole “calories in vs. calories out” thing worked in the human body:
360calories/day x 7days/week x 52 weeks/yr = 131,040 calories (food calories, so, technically, that’s kilocalories).
A pound of fat has 3,500 calories. So, they should have lost 37.4 pounds per year.
However, on average they lost about 2 pounds. BUT, and this is particularly apropos to the article, they GAINED in waist circumference! In other words they got fatter at a slightly lower weight.
#2. Measure what matters
What matters most is what your body is composed of – body composition. How much of you is fat and how much of you is lean? This determines how you look naked.
It is entirely possible for a woman to drop 2 sizes (i.e. 8 to a 4) but to only drop 5lbs on the scale. If she were to just go by the scale, then the 3 months that it took to achieve this would seem like a waste – only 5 pounds in 3 months! But, if she looked at herself in the mirror she would say, “wow! No more cellulite!” And if she looked at how her clothes fit, she’d notice that her pants don’t stay up. (By that I mean that her pants are too big for her now. What were you thinking?)

It’s possible for a man to gain weight while loses body-fat. If you just went by the scale, you would say that he failed – he gained weight. But if you looked at him in the mirror, you’d see exactly what most men want – more muscle and less fat at the same time.
Traditional weight loss programs emphasize the number on the scale, and have people on low-fat, low calorie diet doing lots of aerobic exercise. On this type of program 25-50% of what you’ll lose will be lean body mass. So, if you drop 10 pounds, up to 5 could be lean body mass.
In body composition, losing fat and gaining muscle are both positives. On the scale the above person would be a success. But, in terms of body composition, they made no progress at all – 5lbs of lean lost, and 5lbs of fat lost = 0lbs net progress.
The most practical way for most people to measure their body composition is with a tape measure. It is simple, fast, reliable (if you get spring-loaded tape measure so you always use the same amount of tension) and does not require you to be dunked underwater with no air in your lungs or to be exposed to radiation.
Most health clubs offer skin fold caliper readings, BUT, these are neither accurate nor precise (reliable) unless you happen to get somebody who has done several thousand skin fold measurements in a research setting. That is unlikely with the low pay and high turnover at health clubs.
The electric scales and hand held devices for measuring body fat (bioelectrical impedance) are horrible in my opinion. I’ve measured myself twice in a day and been 9% mid day and 13% in the evening. I don’t even think that they’re useful to measure change with.
If you really, really want a very accurate, direct reading of your body composition there are 3 options:
• DEXA – a machine that uses x-rays to measure both bone density and body composition. (The draw back is that you have to be exposed to radiation, so you can’t do this very often.)
• Hydrostatic weighing – underwater weighing. This is a way to get your density – body composition. Just unpleasant, but no radiation.
• Bod Pod – uses a chamber of pressurized air instead of water and a scale to get your density. This seems to be less accurate the leaner you are.
If you’d like a fool-proof, time efficient program to optimize your body composition for life, check this out.
Josef Brandenburg is 2010, Washington, DC Personal Trainer of the Year Nominee for both Personal Fitness Professional Magazine and The Washington, DC Fitness Association, The DC Fitness Advisor and the Fitness Expert for the PCOS Challenge TV Show. He shows normal people with hectic lives and average genetics how to create the bodies they want in the time they actually have. To find out more about the 7-Day Free Trial click here. You can also pick up a FREE copy of his brand new CD – “Why Eat Less and Exercise More is The Worst Advice Ever” here.
Straight Talk on Supplements: BS or A Body To Impress?
November 6, 2008 by admin
Filed under Uncategorized
You know those before and after photos in supplement ads that you always thought were BS? Well, now you have proof. Here’s what Rick Schaff (a photographer who does many of those photo shoots) has to say about HIS own involvement with them:
“Some of the before and after photos can be taken on the same day… I have taken some of them on the same day.”
- Rick Schaff (Photographer in the fitness industry)
Watch him saying those words, AND doing a fake before and after in this interview from the movie Bigger, Faster, Stronger.
If you thought that was cool, then click here to read the rest of the article (FREE) at Primer Magazine. There is:
-Another video
-40 references
Please leave a comment on the article.
Josef is also the author of The Body You Want, and a Washington, DC based nominee for 2009 Personal Trainer of the Year from Personal Fitness Professional Magazine. Click here to find out more.






